A Look Behind Mouse 2.0 ver. 2.0

Sign in to queue

Description

Back in December, I talked to Dan Rosenfeld about the capacitive version of the Mouse 2.0 project (we also went by the Fab Lab where mice are born). Hrvoje Benko is a researcher in the Adaptive Systems and Interaction group at Microsoft Research and is also working on the project. I recently stopped by Benko's office to get more info and a detailed look at how some of the optical versions of Mouse 2.0 may work.

In this video, Benko walks us through a deconstruction of the Orb mouse prototype and the FTIR (Frustrated Total Internal Reflection) mouse prototype.

Embed

Download

Download this episode

The Discussion

  • User profile image
    Toni88

    Very cool mouse.....Big Smile

  • User profile image
    USArcher

    This research is interesting and I'm curious what lessons were learned.  I imagine this research delved into new UI concepts.  For example, the Orb mouse may feel very much at home if contextual menus were circular instead of up/down.  Up/down menus require either a finger swipe (mouse 2.0) or wrist movement (mouse 1.0).  Carefully crafted circular menus might only require a tap by the corresponding finger.  Whether that would be advantageous or notm who knows.

  • User profile image
    LarryLarsen

    That's what I was getting at with my question at 4:57. It seemed with these two mouses the focus was on hardware and function more than use planning. 

  • User profile image
    aL_

    that's awsome

     

    so is the name "fab lab" by the way, just... super.. Wink

  • User profile image
    athman

    am guessing that they are also other team is

    working on extending .net framework

    to adapt with this new clicks and new gestures and so on

     

     

    thats true ,right?

     

Add Your 2 Cents