Loading user information from Channel 9

Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9

Latest Achievement:

Loading user information from MSDN

Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN

Visual Studio Achievements

Latest Achievement:

Loading Visual Studio Achievements

Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements

Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

35 minutes, 22 seconds


Right click “Save as…”

Paramesh Vaidyanathan, Principal Product Unit Manager, and Rico Mariani, Architect for the Visual Studio Platform team shares their ideas and long term goals for Visual Studio.

You'll hear about the new changes coming to Visual Studio 2010 like the WPF-based editor, the new Visual Studio extensibility architecture and the key areas the team is looking to address beyond Visual Studio 2010.


Follow the discussion

  • Oops, something didn't work.

    Getting subscription
    Subscribe to this conversation
  • Santosh Benjaminsantosh_b Benjy
    Very interesting. Rico's illustration of the single threaded approach as analogous to the relay race is very good indeed. By the way, I just saw Tim Wagners PDC session on "Extending and Customizing VS" as well. It's good to see that the editor is going to be fully managed. I agree that not everything needs to move to managed code. Just the parts that devs have to interact with can be simplified.

    I'd be interested to see if MPF becomes any simpler to use , or rather, if it takes less code to do things. Couple of things I have come across and have a question on whether VS10/11/x will address
    (1)  Istvan Novak's VSXTra library is a layer on top of MPF that I think is sorely needed. Will that be one of the things addressed in VS10 ( a simpler MPF) ?
    (2) Have you seen Victor Garcia (of Clarius Consulting) post on "Simple things which are incredibly hard" where he points out a couple of areas where things that should be simple one or two lines of code end up being very long winded. I guess VSXTra will help now but again, are we taking this on board for VS10(+) ?

  • Allan LindqvistaL_ Kinect ftw
    cool stuff Smiley
    i really hope the VS time are on the the backs of the wpf team to drive improvments into the platform Smiley
    scott "the man" gu did wonderful things to the .net platform by betting on it with asp.net Smiley

    dogfooding is a good thing and who of not a microsoft team can drive feedback into .net Smiley
    short feedback loops are awsome Smiley
  • Allan LindqvistaL_ Kinect ftw
    it would be cool if you could add support for a new language in your VS installation by just dropping a dll or a folder with dlls in a some directory.. i guess that would be possible with MEF but i wonder hoe far of that is Smiley
  • you people have in-principle OK ideas but you lack the vitality to say NO and to cut to the relevant.
    you end up with kilometers of code, which only reinforces what you are able to do today and ends up defining the status quo for everyone else.  this is comfortable (and so it is understandable - there is no contempt) but there are cleaner ways forward.  
  • Rico Marianiricomariani Perf Dude

    I mean, seriously, wow.

    I think that's the first time I've ever been accused of lacking the vitality to say no.  This is a totally new experience for me.

    And that comment is also lucid and gender neutral.  Mind if I borrow it for my next exec meeting?

    But to your point, there are few people who lament the "kilometers of code" more than I do.  This isn't something you can fix overnight but there isn't any way I'm going to allow a lack of vitality on my part to slow the process down.  I promise.

    Just what I needed, more pressure Smiley
  • good luck to you.

  • Hi guys

    I know I'm a bit slow, I am really interested in what you are doing here from the perspective of being able to ink annotate over the ide - we have several failed attempts at getting this going how we would like it to.  We were so frustrated with the extensiblity (or not) of ides we published a paper on it.  It should be in ACM DL by now, but if not it is here http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~beryl/publications/CHINZ_2008_Issues_of_Extending_IDES.pdf 

    love to hear if you think it will be achievable with the new version.


Remove this comment

Remove this thread


Comments closed

Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums, or Contact Us and let us know.