Optimizing .NET for Modern Hardware

Download this episode

Download Video

Download captions

Download Captions


Charles Torre sits down with Habib Heydarian and Shawn Farkas to discuss .NET optimization for modern hardware.






C9 Stage



Available formats for this video:

Actual format may change based on video formats available and browser capability.

    The Discussion

    • User profile image

      Why C# native is faster than C# CLR-bytecode?
      The fact is that CLR JIT compiler must generate native code for a superscalar processor, but CLR is a stack machine.
      What about the conversion from stack machine to RISC-CISC machine?
      This issue is also a research topic for Java compilation, because JVM and CLR are stack machines.

    • User profile image

      C# JIT compiler generate code for take advantage of Instruction Level Parallelism of modern processors?

    • User profile image

      What about a SPEC benchmark for C#?

      I know exists this benchmarks for Java, but I think C# compiler researchers need this benchmarks in order to test their optimizations.

    • User profile image

      Is the superscalar processor the best platform for execute .NET?
      (considering that .NET CLR is a stack machine and a superscalar processor is a machine based in registers)

      Do you remember the idea of Java processors (Sun's specification named "picoJava")?

      Why not a .NET hardware processor, where native code is the same bytecode?

      What thinks Microsoft about this idea?

      Imagine Azure datacenters with big Symmetric Multiprocessor servers with hundred of .NET processors.

    • User profile image

      @carlospinedag:obviously there are no mass deployment of picoJava around. why would the idea work with .NET this time? What do you think is different nowadays that will make it work?

    Comments closed

    Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to send us feedback you can Contact Us.