Good architect vs. Bad architect

Download this episode

Download Video

Description

The quality bar that separates good and bad architects became much clearer in the last 5 years as industry matured in definition of IT Architect profession expectations, validation criteria and education guidelines. In contrast with engineering, failures of poor architecture decisions are not immediately visible and they rarely cause imminent failure – yet they are still signs of bad architect. In this session we will explore what are the skills, experiences and expected knowledge when hiring/assessing/promoting an architect and what to do when someone doesn't meet expected (or self-advertised) quality bar.

Tag:

tenz

Day:

0

Level:

200

Code:

DPR202

Embed

Format

Available formats for this video:

Actual format may change based on video formats available and browser capability.

    The Discussion

    • User profile image
      Alex Tjahjana

      So disappointing. I'm expecting to watch the recording of DPR202, but what I got is DPR207. :(
      And I can't find DPR202 anywhere, because MS now only record 2 most popular presentations for each track. And guessing from the title, I believe the popular presentation is supposed to be DPR202. If there's a schedule change, the recording should be changed too, isn't it? Can I now please have the recording for DPR202? Thanks.

    • User profile image
      NZMSA

      @Alex Tjahjana:Hi Alex, Thanks for picking up on this, the correct video will be posted later this afternoon.

    • User profile image
      TArchitect

      Great high level, obody else is covering this stuff! Please could you post the PPT?
      Thanks

    Comments closed

    Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums, or Contact Us and let us know.