Windows Server 2012 Deployment and Ongoing Management: Why Server Core Is Right for You

Download this episode

Download Video

Description

Windows Server 2012 provides greater deployment flexibility and richer ongoing management capabilities. We discuss new deployment options for Windows Server 2012 and its roles and features, including the ability to minimize server footprint using Features on Demand. This session also details the flexibility you can enjoy by seamlessly moving between Server Core (recommended), Minimal Server Interface or full GUI installations. We dive deep into Server Manager’s new multi-server remote management capabilities to see how it can centralize management across many servers with a rich unified view, tailored to your environment and the way you want to manage. By understanding the new deployment and management possibilities, you will leave prepared to design your deployments and plan your ongoing management.

For more information, check out this course on Microsoft Virtual Academy:

Day:

1

Session Type:

Breakout

Code:

MDC-B339

Room:

Room 393

Embed

Format

Available formats for this video:

Actual format may change based on video formats available and browser capability.

    The Discussion

    • User profile image
      Belky

      Hopefully it will make more sense than with 2008 core.

    • User profile image
      StephenJones​RHIT

      Looking for insight and skills into the best way to manage a Windows Server 2012 core installation.

    • User profile image
      rmattei

      I'm looking forward to this, I like the idea of server core, but it didn't look right in 2008

    • User profile image
      jbdavisii

      I also am looking forward to the features of Windows 2012 Core and how this can be integrated into  my environment for management, security and application performance.

    • User profile image
      JAnglum

      I would like to understand when and why to use Core as well as what complications this may cause vs. a traditional install of the Windows server operating system.

    • User profile image
      Deactivated User

      Will there be any discussion of UAC?  IS there any UAC on server core?

    • User profile image
      johnreed

      I like the idea of core because you can take out all the modules and GUI stuff you don't need, but still get the management functionality from System Center, Server Manager, etc. 

      It would be good to get some numbers (i.e. for a 1000 VM environment, you can save X% GB, Y% CPU, Z% RAM for an average workload.

    • User profile image
      johnreed

      I like the idea of core because you can take out all the modules and GUI stuff you don't need, but still get the management functionality from System Center, Server Manager, etc. 

      It would be good to get some numbers (i.e. for a 1000 VM environment, you can save X% GB, Y% CPU, Z% RAM for an average workload.

    • User profile image
      IanBurchette

      You mentioned there was ~ 4Gb savings between server core and the full GUI. Does that estimate include savings from removing the SxS files as well?

    Comments closed

    Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums, or Contact Us and let us know.