I have an intranet site built with Sitefinity by Telerik that works great, but users are finding editing and creating HTML documents difficult using the RadEditor for HTML.
Any niners here use Teleriks web controls, and can you suggest any way I can get users to like the system?
No sorry mate,..
I tend to steer clear on these types of controls or frameworks, they always gave me a headache.
And how do you get to users to like the system? Implement an even worse one?
What are they used to? Why can't they use that and paste the HTML in?
Unfortunately I have inherited this, so I have to try an limit the damage. It would have been better to use TinyMCE, that is what is used in WordPress and Channel 9, but Sitefinity does come with a tonne of stuff that would take months or even years to duplicate
@vesuvius: I can imagine that some events are causing problems with that embedded editor, what are the user's complaints sounding like?
However, in my experience, very few CMS admins have the ability to be creating HTML content for pages, and so it's really not the right tool for "users" who can't happily switch to html mode for making minor adjustments.
Personally, I normally implement "widgets" (either Composite or User Controls for the Sitefinity environment) that do all of the "thinking" for the content admins, and manage the html, styling, etc for them. They then just drag the required widgets onto the page, select configuration options, point & click to insert images, links, etc, and enter any minimally formatted text content.
This is how Sitefinity is really designed to be implemented - with the generic-content control (RadEditor) being the fall-back point when something more specialized isn't available or appropriate.
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums, or Contact Us and let us know.