Coffeehouse Thread

56 posts

Patents that should not be patents

Back to Forum: Coffeehouse
  • User profile image
    Bass

    AndyC,

    You are in desperate need to at least read the Wikipedia article on "patent" at the bare minimum.

    It's also very important use correct legal words to describe things, saying that copyright is for inventions and patents are for ideas and than diminishing the differences as being pointless legalities makes you look you have no clue what you are talking about.

  • User profile image
    AndyC

    , Bass wrote

    AndyC,

    You are in desperate need to at least read the Wikipedia article on "patent" at the bare minimum.

    The best place to learn anything is not Wikipedia. You can have that advice for free.

    It's also very important use correct legal words to describe things, saying that copyright is for inventions and patents are for ideas and than diminishing the differences as being pointless legalities makes you look you have no clue what you are talking about.

    I have no clue what you're talking about. I have never said the difference between a patent and copyright is pointless. I'm quite aware of exactly what the difference is. I'm not overly sure you are.

Comments closed

Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums, or Contact Us and let us know.