Now that's just disingenuous. You have no idea how long this will take to implement nor how many people want this feature implemented.
Back at you.
It's just baffeling at what lengths you'll go to in order to skew the argument in Microsoft's favor.
Your personal attacks against me are getting tiring and are going quite a long way beyond plain rude. If you think Microsoft can magically implement extra features without diverting resources from other areas and features, that's your problem. But don't try and suggest that saying Microsoft having finite resources is somehow me "skewing the argument in Microsoft's favour".