seems like streams running on files.ch9.ms are working and smooth.ch9.ms are not.
@Maddus Mattus: Where are you located? Can you do a trace to smooth.ch9.ms?
Traceren van de route naar mschannel9.vo.msecnd.net [22.214.171.124] via maximaal 30 hops:
1 2 ms 2 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 16 ms 15 ms 15 ms 90-145-28-78.network.unet.nl [126.96.36.199] 3 17 ms 16 ms 16 ms 90-145-28-81-ams-unet-dc2-dx01.network.unet.nl [ 188.8.131.52] 4 16 ms 29 ms 16 ms 90-145-29-77-ams-unet-sar-cx01.network.unet.nl [ 184.108.40.206] 5 16 ms 28 ms 18 ms 82-148-204-42-ams-unet-sar-br01.network.unet.nl [220.127.116.11] 6 16 ms 18 ms 16 ms ams-ix-2.microsoft.com [18.104.22.168] 7 16 ms 36 ms 15 ms ge-4-3-0-0.ams-64cb-1a.ntwk.msn.net [22.214.171.124 4] 8 16 ms 15 ms 24 ms 10gigabitethernet2-2.ams-xmx-edgcom-1a.ntwk.msn. net [126.96.36.199] 9 16 ms 16 ms 16 ms cds147.ams9.msecn.net [188.8.131.52]
De trace is voltooid.
I can reach the server just fine,..
It just wont give me any smoothstreams,..
I am located in The Netherlands
GET /ch9/40f7/b6b3f3ff-cb97-47f1-a9bf-9ecd00bc40f7/CloudCoverEp44UmbracoAndWindowsAzure.ism/manifest HTTP/1.1 Accept: */* Referer: http://channel9.msdn.com/scripts/Channel9.xap?v=1.5 Accept-Language: nl-NL Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0) Host: smooth.ch9.ms Connection: Keep-Alive
Similar behavior with practically any video on C9 front page. Are you guys asleep, on vacation or someone hacked your servers?
Silence is always a good sign, that they are working very hard on it and don't have time to post
@sokhaty: can you try again now? We are using an early CTP feature in the CDN and they ran into a snage for the past few days. It is supposedly resolved now, but since it was only happening in some regions I can't really be 100% sure without some user testing...
All the videos seem to be working for me now.
@Duncanma:You are using beta versions in a production environment! Shame on you
In some ways, a lot of Channel 9 exists as it is now due to that very fact. When it originally launched (before I was on the team) it was using ASP.NET, before ASP.NET was officially ready for production. I believe that was one of several reasons why Channel 9 essentially was a rogue entity at Microsoft, not at all against policy, but unable to run within the existing web-site operations structure of microsoft.com because it was built using pre-production technologies.
This is a tradition we've continued though. We launched Silverlight support before it was RTM'd, we used ASP.NET MVC before that was RTM'd, for a while we ran pre-release versions of Expression Encoder and we are now using Azure CDN features before they are RTM'd. We are just 'special' that way
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums, or Contact Us and let us know.