wkempf said:
exoteric said:

I'll agree with tuple syntax, but the (1, 2, 3) stuff isn't the important part. What's much more important is tuple assignment.


int a, b, c;

(a, b, c) = TupleReturningMethod();

I'll buy that for a dollar. I really liked that way of "decomposing" a tuple when using SML. Both are ways to make programs shorter because ultimately you don't need it, just as you don't need foreach.