Episode 228: Building Games with Service Fabric
Haishi Bai
Haishi.Bai
Entries
Episode 221: Azure Analysis Services with Josh Caplan
Episode 221: Azure CLI with Jason Shaver
Episode 220: API Management Updates with Anton Babadjanov
Episode 219: Visual Studio Mobile Center with Thomas Dohmke
Episode 218: DDD and CQRS on Service Fabric with MediaValet
Episode 217: Azure Active Directory B2C with Swaroop Krishnamurthy
Episode 216: Azure News Recap with Chris and Haishi October 2016
Episode 215: AzureBot with Thiago Almeida
Episode 214: HockeyApp and Application Insights with Evgeny Ternovsky and Josh Weber
Episode 213: Azure App Service Best Practices for Large Scale Applications
Episode 212: Service Fabric Series (3 of 3) - Service Fabric on Linux
Comments
Meet WACEL
Hi ivan:
To answer your questions:
1. The library itself is stateless, so it scales along with backend services.
2. The size is limited by backend service, such as the size of your cache cluster.
3. Because all operations go through the backend service, the existing telemetry, logging and monitor tools are still applicable. However it cold be a good idea to include more metrics counters to provide fine-tuned perf info.
4. There will be more blog articles and video introductions coming out. Keep tuned!
Thank you!
Meet WACEL
Thank you for your interests in WACEL! WACEL is designed to make common scenarios easier. If you have any scenarios that you think that WACEL could be helpful, please feel free to reach out to us by sending a mail to hbai@microsoft.com.
Windows Azure Cloud Services Concepts (Part 1)
@11111111: Yes. Your customers access your services via endpoints, and traffic will be distribute across your roles in a round-robin fashion.
Windows Azure Cloud Services Role Lifecycle
@mohandeval2: Thank you for your feedback. We'll see if we could fix it.
Using the Request-Acknowledge-Push Pattern to Display Progress of Long Running Tasks
LOL. Sorry for the typo. Fixed now
Using the Request-Acknowledge-Push Pattern to Display Progress of Long Running Tasks
Hi PeterNL: Thank you for comment. We have a couple of episodes being edited at the moment and we are recording more. This is a new series and there are still some details we need to work out. So we might be slow in releasing the first few episodes.Thank you for your patience, and please keep tuned! And if you and anyone else in the community want to share your experiences you are welcome to contact me at any time.
Using the Request-Acknowledge-Push Pattern to Display Progress of Long Running Tasks
Source code link is fixed.
Using the Request-Acknowledge-Push Pattern to Display Progress of Long Running Tasks
@peternl: Thank you for your kind comment. I've added source code link to the post. We'll have more episodes coming very soon, keep tuned
.
Advanced Cloud Services Development
Here's the link to the Fireworks demo I mentioned but didn't have time to show during the session:
http://haishibai.blogspot.com/2012/11/play-fireworks-together-process-of.html
Announcing Microsoft’s U-Prove Community Technical Preview (CTP)
An e-commerce transaction is not completed until the actual merchandise has been shipped. However to get the goods to be shipped people are forced to disclose their real addresses to online venders. Here’s my two cents – an anonymous shipping system. Basically a user will pick one trusted carrier such as UPS and get a token that represents her address. Then when she’s purchasing online, she’ll give the token to the vender instead of a real shipping address. The vender can call to UPS service to validate the token and get shipping cost estimation (or the token can have zip code in it for cost estimation), but the vender never knows where the product is shipped to. The token can be static or dynamic – user can apply new tokens any time. I’m not sure if U-Prove consider the scenario like this?