These are cool, but I wish someone released a library with pixelshader effects more designed for UI elements. Most of these effects wouldn't be routinely used in UI design. For starters, I'd like a good replacement for the Outerglow bitmap effect, and
I'd also like a few other types of glow effects, like those mimicking the ones you see on the taskbar. Im sure there are others I could think of also. I don't know how to do HLSL yet myself.
I haven't read everything Alan Cooper said, or seen the quote in context, but I'll say this:
Its true that some users will give you input that is misguided or not helpful and they think something will be good that would actually turn out bad,
Many users have the understanding of design and programming that that the actual designers do, whether they actually can program or just instinctively understand the issues involved.
Its the same thing with kindergarteners and their teachers, its very possible for there to be a child who can pose a challenge to a teacher, whether because he is particularly smart and can point something out, or because he just doesn't fit the teachers expectation
forces the teacher to address issues that the child wants to be addressed.
Move beyond the kindergartener and teacher analogy and look to college student/college professor where this is more pronounced. Often students at this level are intelligent and understanding enough that, even without years of experience, and knowledge of particular
facts and details, they could understand certain things, including the larger picture, better than their teachers.
Its also possible for someone who is not an accredited expert in a field to have better intuition than someone who is an accredited expert. Psychologists, lawyers, politicians, theorists, (software designers) etc., all have access to the same information everyone
else does. Outside the experts is usually where geniuses any given field come from, though you don't need to be a genius to have some worthwhile understanding. Geniuses in a field usually are able to articulate all of the dissatisfaction and doubt that people
outside the field had but were unable to put in the right terms. Experts in the field may have no real insight and just be working as hacks, doing what they think users want based on what they've learned; and may sometimes have even less clue on what to do
than the users.
You don't assume people who haven't been given some degree, or spent as many years doing design as you, or knows all of the minute details of the Windows API and programming in C++ are clueless.
If you go back to talking about the software industry, even if some users have as much understanding as the designers, not all do---but all users might have some particular thing they understand better, or at the least some issue they have that the designer
has to pay attention to--because their issues with their software don't always come out of stupidity but real problems. Even if those users can't encapsulate what the real problem is with their software or they can't encapsulate what the solution should be,
at the bottom of their complaint or suggestion is usually something real that needs to be looked at.
In the end, not only should designers understand the users, but understand what the user says they want, and why they say they want it, to understand how to create the software. And often times what they say they want is actually what they want. Designers should
never dismiss what users say they want, if they find the user wrong, they should be able to convince the user in some way why they're wrong. If they can't do that, they can't deliver a good product.
Maybe Alan Cooper is simplifying things when he makes that statement out of context. But thats exactly something I'm sick of, making simplistically bold statements.
Take laptops, for example. For a long time, vendors did not make laptops that used "desktop" CPUs (i.e. non-mobile parts) because they thought the same as you: who's going to want a laptop that has no "SpeedStep" or mobile power management? It's going to
be hot, heavy, and because the CPU is always going at 100%, it's going to have next to no battery life.
Well, as it turns out there was a demand for those laptops once they were made. Why? Because they were
cheap. Once the price dropped past a certain point, people apparently decided they would just deal with the low battery life, high heat & heavy weight.
Karim not everyone who buys a notebook wants to carry it to the park and use it on park benches or use it on his bed with the power supply unplugged. I have a desktop replacement notebook, I want a notebook so its semi-portable, so I can take it with me when
I travel, so I can bring it to libraries with a scanner, etc. In all cases I take it with me and plug it in somewhere else. I assume people who buy low-end notebooks with low battery life care about the same thing, and don't need it running on batteries most
of the time.
The only market for a mini-tablet is one where you can carry it around without having to plug it in.
Otherwise its not worth getting. People won't want to replace their notebooks, they'll want to get something to complement it that has mobile capabilities.
I'll repeat why I haven't bought a tablet, evne though I'd like the functionality: I'm paying more for a less powerful notebook, that would substitute for another notebook. Plus I would only use the tablet functions 5% of the time. With a device like Origami
it would be nice to be $500 but if its $1000 its not so critical if it has high battery life. If you can have a device like this with high battery life and is portable, its still a good price range, as something to buy in addition to your notebook/desktop.
Otherwise its not worth getting. Thats why battery life is critical.
I also seriously believe that what Microsoft should be looking at this as is finding a marketable form for a tablet pc. I don't think current full sized tablet pcs will really take off in any major way, I think they need a design like this.
Biggest disappointment is the resolution. It's basically a Tablet PC with 800 x 480 resolution. The hardware scaling will help, but... at the end of the day it's still stuffing 10 pounds of stuff in a 5-pound bag... Having 1024 x 768 on the VGA output will
help: you can plug it into a monitor, use a Bluetooth keyboard/mouse and get some work done.
Why do you want everything looking extremely tiny on a mobile device? Especially when its touch/pen based? Higher resulution makes sense if you're talking about scalable GUIs like those promised with Vista/XAML. But I don't want a tiny crowded interface on
a mini-tablet, which is what you would get on XP with high resolutions
i wear eyeglasses. im not really interested in laser eye surgery, because my vision has stopped deteriorating, i don't mind wearing glasses (for many reasons i like it), and there are risks even if they are minimal with surgery
btw, bill gates should really improve his posture i mean its one thing not to have perfect posture but his is really bad
the entire favorites system should be tag based, imo (not necssarily killing folders in doing that). maybe they're planning that with the vista version.
and preferably some way to incorporate some type of live favorites into the UI. i have internet bookmarks on del.icio.us , and in firefox, i can turn that into a link based menu. it still doesn't work that well though, and no firefox extensions really make
it work well. but if microsoft can get something like this to work with IE7 then they will have at least one great advantage over firefox.
it would also be nice if the save dialog box for images and files in general had right there input boxes for the files metadata and tags. hopefully they will work this into Vista common dialog box, and the Vista version of IE.
im a little disappointed that theyre separating internet explorer from windows explorer interface wise (no more folder sidebar for instance) because ithought it was a good bedrock. im also disappointed some of the changes mean killing the idea of a search sidebar,
which was not implented in the best way but could be improved to be.
and i'll restate, i find aesthetic problems with parts of the interface and the icons, which is a problem i have with vista too.
Minh wrote:What information does Phishing Filter send to Microsoft?
When you use Phishing Filter to check websites automatically or manually, the address of the website you are visiting will be sent to Microsoft, together with some standard information from your computer such as
IP address, browser type, and Phishing Filter version number.
Now, why does MS want my IP to see if a site is a phishing site or not?
Think about it for a second.
All HTTP based traffic includes the IP address. You can't browse to any website without disclosing your IP.
The requesting IP address is not used in the evaluation of the site.
Can we be confirmed that MS is NOT recording my IP?
Edit: More from the help file-- Microsoft will not use the information it receives to personally identify you. For more information about what information is sent and how it is used, see the
Internet Explorer privacy statement.
OK. Good. Just that there's a lot of things to be paranoid about lately.
I agree - I don't believe Microsoft would use this tool for harm, on purpose. Just imagine the bad press!
My concern is US Law. Microsoft has *NO CHOICE* if the US Government decides to monitor the URLs of every IE user in the entire world. Microsoft is bound by US Law.
bad press affects elected officials also. too bad our government is corrupt, so we have lack of trust in our elected officials (because of corruption, part of the blame can go back to corporations also).
i'm not worrying at all personally, i don't believe any widespread harm will happen because of this, there are still enough elements in society that are vigilant against abuse. (still we need to work to make the political process more transparent and open to
avoid worries like this.)
you can have two history sidebars open. click on the arrow to the right of the forward button, click on history. then click on the favorites center and the history button, then dock it to the side. silly, huh?
put in a URL for a local address, and it will always open it in a new browser window, and if you have firefox as your default browser, it will open it in firefox. why work this way?
there seems to be a problem with this reply to webpage, when i type the page scrolls up, which is annoying.
i still think the icons (and vista icons generally) are a little garish as are the two back/forward buttons side by side. its good that the interface is simplified but it also looks cluttered as if theyre trying to put too much in a small space
i haven't tested yet, but i'm hoping IE7 has support for 'inline-block'. if it does (which firefox doesn't except through a proprietary hack *ahem*), screw firefox.
oh yea, and when live bookmarks is developed, i hope there is a nice way to integrate it into the browser interface. if you could view RSS feeds like you view favorites, and then just have an RSS feed for live bookmarks, that would take care of that.
(i always wished search sidebar had been improved btw, instead of everyone moving to search toolbar boxes)