For sake of argument, I will assume that your comment is based on an interest to join our team and are afraid that not being internal hurts those chances. This is not the case and I will look forward to seeing your resume as we can always
use more people to help us respond to random comments.
I'm afraid I would fall short in the area of obsessive study of Microsoft®
Teams and Product lines. I prefer a much more balanced approach and would end up asking much more pointed questions that would actually have the curious side effect of improving your products.
I don't see that as being the initiative behind these videos.
I listened to the audio version of this video...maybe that was a mistake.
It is interesting to see what they consider "safe" and "unsafe", but wouldn't the scope and type of a variable inherently limit the extent of its "side effects"? And the same with functions? Perhaps a better definition of "safe" is in order.
I should note I have never programmed in
Haskell, but it looks intriguing.