Thanks for the quick reply. Let me expand on it a bit.
So far all I have seen is small little examples of what WPF apps might look like, with the exception of Blend and Design.
The apps that are being shown in the web casts are horrid. Win32 looks a lot better. You guys have done a great job, and I am sure 80% of your time has been spent re-iterating design instead of real UI coding (we acknowledge you are breaking new ground here), but I'm sure you'll be the first to admit that these apps are 20+ man years in the making.
One nice looking app is the medical patient app demo. Nicely done. But as you dig into it you find a huge amount of code+XAML and an app that probably has 10% of the functionality that it would need in the real world. It staggers the mind to think what it would take to build the full application. Is this the intent for WPF apps, limited to only large development efforts and budgets? Or is there something else happening within say, a year?
I'm thinking about the bread and butter clients who need me to do a database app. Do I tell him that WPF is not really an option, yet? I guess to some extent, the idea that I need a dedicated UI designer (who is not a coder) already answers my question to
some extent. I have never seen a budget that would include such a position. I guess I was hoping that I, as a coder, could make the switch to using WPF, but I guess that isn't going to happen soon.