Loading user information from Channel 9

Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9

Latest Achievement:

Loading user information from MSDN

Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN

Visual Studio Achievements

Latest Achievement:

Loading Visual Studio Achievements

Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements

Cloud Cover Episode 43 - Scalable Counters with Windows Azure

30 minutes, 13 seconds


Right click “Save as…”

Join Wade and Steve each week as they cover the Windows Azure Platform. You can follow and interact with the show @CloudCoverShow.

In this episode, Steve and Wade explain the application architecture of their latest creation—the Apathy Button. Like many other popular buttons on the Internet, the Apathy Button has to deal with the basic challenge of concurrency. This concurrency challenge arises from multiple role instancesas well as multiple threadsall trying to update the same number. In this show, you'll learn a few approaches to solving this in Windows Azure.

In the news:

Grab the source code the Apathy Button
Steve's blog post on the application


Follow the discussion

  • Oops, something didn't work.

    Getting subscription
    Subscribe to this conversation
  • Dave Williamsondavewill here birdie birdie, get in my belly!

    Apathy Button - PERFECT!  Its like an electronic stress ball.

  • Greg Braygbrayut Check out PhraseMeme Scanner for Windows Phone at ​PhraseMeme.​com

    Marginally decent show  Tongue Out

    Actually I was recently trying to figure out a way to do atomic increments using queues or table storage, so this gives me some good ideas. I really wanted a way that did not require proxying the requests through a web role to reduce scale-out costs, but after watching the show and seeing steve's response it looks like your approach would be best.

    Thanks... can't wait to watch what is new next week at MIX!

  • It looks like some people could care less than they did. I've been watching the progress go up but the last time I checked it was down

    37618 <-- ???

    Is the counter decrease related to caching or are you updating the code to only recording unique per site?

  • Mark TuckerMark Tucker

    Steve & Wade care, so we don't have to.

    Thanks for the episode.

Remove this comment

Remove this thread


Comments closed

Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums, or Contact Us and let us know.