Everything you wanted to know about VC++ deployment but were afraid to ask
Great timing. I'd love to see more mono content, esp since I plan to do some OS X / C# dev soon.
This is getting ridiculous.
Enough with the ~1GB video sizes! For this, you'd need at most maybe 350MB, and that's pushing it. I'd say maybe 200MB/hour would be perfectly fine quality in Xvid; I know many users wouldn't have an Xvid codec installed, but they're only 1mb or so- It's obviously worth the space trade-off.
Pon wrote:This is getting ridiculous.
Enough with the ~1GB video sizes! For this, you'd need at most maybe 350MB, and that's pushing it. I'd say maybe 200MB/hour would be perfectly fine quality in Xvid; I know many users wouldn't have an Xvid codec installed, but they're only 1mb or so- It's obviously worth the space trade-off.
Charles wrote:
Pon wrote:
This is getting ridiculous.
Enough with the ~1GB video sizes! For this, you'd need at most maybe 350MB, and that's pushing it. I'd say maybe 200MB/hour would be perfectly fine quality in Xvid; I know many users wouldn't have an Xvid codec installed, but they're only 1mb or so- It's obviously worth the space trade-off.
Pon,
We will be addressing this issue (rediculously large downloadable video files as an only download option) in V4 (). I promise.
Thank you for the feedback.
Keep on posting,
C
Can somebody enlighten me here? When I click the fullscreen link it launches WMP11 and starts playing audio but the picture is black and stays that way, but when I click the download link it launches WMP11 and starts playing with both audio and video.
Same thing on the CES movies, I can listen to them but there is no video (all black). Running WMP11 on a Windows Vista Ultimate x86 based Dell Vostro 1400 with Intel graphics adn silverlight installed.
//MW
PS. I know this isn´t a support forum but I can´t seem to find any info on this issue anywhere on the web and it´s driving me nuts.
someone wrote:I stopped downloading videos because of the insane file sizes..(cough) Today in 2008 we have both, H.264 and PCs capable of playing it. (cough) And when you guys switched to Silverlight, I come here less frequently now. I've found media streamed using Silverlight to be the worst performer in the industry...nowhere do my videos stick so much than MSN Video, 10, Channel9 or Microsoft.com. Also, Silverlight do not seem to cache the already downloaded/streamed part of the video. It doesn't give as much flexibility as the WMP ActiveX control did.
Charles wrote:
Keep the feedback coming, please. We need it!
C
esoteric wrote:
Charles wrote:
Keep the feedback coming, please. We need it!
C
I love HD, keep that comming.
By the way, is that the Peter Sestoft of ML fame? Looks like it is.
I should warn people that I say "excellent" quite a bit in this one. My apologies to those that I offend ![]()
C
Charles wrote:I should warn people that I say "excellent" quite a bit in this one. My apologies to those that I offend
C
Whilst the wording may be a little too strong for my liking, I do agree with the sentiment. Many people still have download limits and slower connections.
I'm missing the .NET Show which I think did a much better job of delivering professional content. I particularly enjoyed having multiple versions of the video, so that you could choose the quality.
I think at least there should be a version which is playable on a mobile device. With these videos that clearly isn't going to possible (processor wise). This is particularly a problem for me as in the past I have watched videos on my windows mobile whilst commuting.
The content of the video is excellent and interesting, but I had to laugh, at times it sounded like from the interviewer's perspective it was going something like....
Peter: <incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ...yea
Peter: <incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ..sure
Peter: <incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ..excellent
Peter: <incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ..nice
Peter: ..<incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ..wow
micklang wrote:The content of the video is excellent and interesting, but I had to laugh, at times it sounded like from the interviewer's perspective it was going something like....
Peter: <incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ...yea
Peter: <incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ..sure
Peter: <incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ..excellent
Peter: <incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ..nice
Peter: ..<incomprehensible techy stuff>
Interviewer: ..wow
Nice article, I going to download both stuff and play with that.
Thx