Hanselminutes on 9 - ASP.NET MVC 3 and NEW ASP.NET Futures with Phil Haack and Morgan the Intern
- Posted: Jul 27, 2010 at 10:06 AM
- 49,591 Views
- 17 Comments
Scott sneaks into the office of Phil Haack and Morgan the Canadian Intern to talk about the release of ASP.NET MVC 3 Preview 1 and some of the cool "futures" stuff that Morgan (and our fleet of interns) is working on.
Comments Closed
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
More episodes in this show
-
Hanselminutes on 9 - Social Networking for…
-
Hanselminutes on 9 - ASP.NET MVC 3 and NEW ASP.NET…
-
Hanselminutes on 9 - Gadget Basement with Ward…
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
I can't wait to move to this.
I'm going to get to delete so much code.
Sorry, off-topic, but: Separated at birth? Below is a picture of Austrian radio host Peter L. Eppinger
ViewData vs. ViewModel... that's sort of unnecessary complexity to MVC. My vote is for ViewDataDictionary to inherit from IDynamicMetaObjectProvider so that we can have the best of both worlds with 1 concept. But that's just me....
Another great video. Love this more candid style.
Looking forward to trying out MVC 3
lol. Nice sense of humor.
Will my issue be solved in MVC3?
http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/560601-ASPNET-MVC-MultiSelect-issue/
Dynamic Dictionaries are really easy to create in .NET 4, I did a post on it here: http://www.aaron-powell.com/dynamic-dictionaries-with-csharp-4 and although you do loose the intellisense capabilities I think that'd be a small price to pay to have a simplified data management method.
Having ViewData and ViewModel could get confusing (unless ViewModel is just a wrapper on ViewData) and it'd make testing harder as you need to ensure that the data is being added to the "right" collection.
that is good team. i know Phil Haack' blog and tutorials. i don't understand main goal of MVC 3. maybe my English is poor
Hey Now Scott,
Great Vid!
Thx 4 the info,
Catto
cool, but i think it'll be rally confusing that the "ViewModel" property is called "View" when you're in the view (and only in the Razor view)
sure its terse, but you have no way of deducing where that property comes from unless you do some digging
Is there still a need for ViewData to pass arguments to a Master page or an EditorFor template partial view? What is the reason for limiting a view to a single model object? Would be neat to be able to pass arguments from a view to a master page.
So where's Morgans CSS Sprite generator? It looks great.
Meaning...?
What I loved about this was peeking over the shoulder of two developers working hard on ASP.NET. It doesn't matter that it was more candid and had mistakes and issues. You can see a lot of thought is going into this work. It's not fluff and it's being driven by these developers. It really breaks down some of the misguided idea that it's a monolithic organization moving in lockstep.
hahahah burns your retina display... no this is a flip.... hahah
outstanding job!
I need to change alot of code at my end, but it rocks! :)
See i'm blushing!
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close