What's different about the 3 versions of Rx? Part 3: .NET 3.5 SP1
Description
Now that we have explained
"Marble Diagrams", we use this representation to describe what Rx's Until and WaitUntil behavior is.
You can watch all of the Rx tutorials here.
You can watch all of the Rx tutorials here.
Share
Download
Download this episode
- High Quality WMV (65.9 MB)
- MP3 (2.5 MB)
- Low Quality MP4 (19.7 MB)
- Mid Quality WMV (29.6 MB)
More episodes in this series
Reactive Extensions API in depth: Subscribing
Related episodes
Bart De Smet: Rx and Cortana
New release of Rx for .NET & JS (v1.0.2617.0) available!
New drop of Rx (.NET & JS) available
Jeffrey Van Gogh and Bart De Smet: Inside System.Interactive
Reactive Extensions API in depth: Retry
Reactive Extensions API in depth: Repeat
Jeffrey Van Gogh: Testing Rx with Pex
Rx API in depth: Hot and Cold observables
Rx API in depth: Concat, Catch and OnErrorResumeNext
Reactive Extensions API in depth: CombineLatest
The Discussion
-
aL_ awsome
but why doesnt the other parts of the rx series show up on the main page? i'd hate for people to miss out on this hotness
-
LPCRoy Agreed! Please add the relevant Rx Tags to this video so I can find it later.
-
Charles They are tagged...
http://channel9.msdn.com/tags/Reactive+Extensions/
http://channel9.msdn.com/tags/Rx/
C -
Tom Lokhorst Just get things clear, is the following true?
WaitUntil(xs, ys)does not propagate the exception fromysif it happens before ys starts producing values, but it will propagate afterysstarted producing values?Or, the exception propagates after
xsandysstarted producing values? -
jlomax I'm confused. Is "WaitUntil" actually "SkipUntil" ??? If what I thought I saw was right, this name is very misleading.
Audio is poor on WMV (High).
-
MarioTP I think the name "WaitUntil" is very good, because it does what it says!
The result-IO "waits until" a defined event fires.
I think what you mean is "SkipWhile". But in case of this function you have to define a predicate and no event!